>>>>> "SF" == Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> writes:

SF> That'd be IPsec, not IP, I guess. How many people actually
SF> use IPsec that way?

I don't know.  AIUI, hams have been specified as a reason for NULL for
most ietf work product.

For this case, though, it seems Robert's suggestion of CMAC and GMAC may
be better long term.

Although there is stil the issue of compatibility with existing users,
if there are any.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <[email protected]>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

Reply via email to