Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: >> It is a switch to request integrity only. Or to only allow integrity >> only. Either party MUST be able to reject an integrity only >> negotiation.
> That's not good enough. It should be the case that integrity-only
> negotiations are rejected by default, unless there's no protocol
> requirement for confidentiality. If there is no need for
> confidentiality, then the answer to the DISCUSS should be "there is no
> need for confidentiality."
All of those knobs, correctly labelled, are all there already. Really.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
pgpDqUZjE86_N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
