Hi Samu, thanks for having revised RFC6253bis:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ Could you please let us know the current status of the draft now that it has been revised? That is, what needs to happen next and what is needed overall before the draft is ready for WGLC. Cheers, Gonzalo On 23/06/2015 11:15 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: > Hi all, > > yes, we will update the document as soon as possible. > > BR, > Samu Varjonen > > On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >> Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis, >> >> the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3 >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01 >> >> RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that >> it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a >> normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the >> publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis, >> and RFC5205bis). >> >> Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on >> your plans to revise this document? >> >> Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated >> reference? >> >> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401 >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > > _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
