Hi Samu,

to be clear, you are saying that the draft is ready for Working Group
Last Call, is that right?

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 01/07/2015 9:14 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> to my knowledge rfc6253-bis does not need changes to work with rfc7401.
> Review and comments would still be welcome.
> 
> -Samu
> 
> On 30/06/15 10:10, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> Hi Samu,
>>
>> thanks for having revised RFC6253bis:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/
>>
>> Could you please let us know the current status of the draft now that it
>> has been revised? That is, what needs to happen next and what is needed
>> overall before the draft is ready for WGLC.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> On 23/06/2015 11:15 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> yes, we will update the document as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Samu Varjonen
>>>
>>> On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis,
>>>>
>>>> the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis:
>>>>
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3
>>>>
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01
>>>>
>>>> RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that
>>>> it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a
>>>> normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the
>>>> publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis,
>>>> and RFC5205bis).
>>>>
>>>> Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on
>>>> your plans to revise this document?
>>>>
>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated
>>>> reference?
>>>>
>>>>     draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Gonzalo
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>>
>>>
> 

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

Reply via email to