Hi Samu, thanks. I have just started a WGLC on the draft.
Cheers, Gonzalo On 03/07/2015 8:02 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: > Hi Gonzalo, > > In my opinion yes > > BR, > Samu > > Lainaus Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > >> Hi Samu, >> >> to be clear, you are saying that the draft is ready for Working Group >> Last Call, is that right? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> On 01/07/2015 9:14 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> to my knowledge rfc6253-bis does not need changes to work with rfc7401. >>> Review and comments would still be welcome. >>> >>> -Samu >>> >>> On 30/06/15 10:10, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Samu, >>>> >>>> thanks for having revised RFC6253bis: >>>> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ >>>> >>>> Could you please let us know the current status of the draft now that it >>>> has been revised? That is, what needs to happen next and what is needed >>>> overall before the draft is ready for WGLC. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Gonzalo >>>> >>>> On 23/06/2015 11:15 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> yes, we will update the document as soon as possible. >>>>> >>>>> BR, >>>>> Samu Varjonen >>>>> >>>>> On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis, >>>>>> >>>>>> the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3 >>>>>> >>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01 >>>>>> >>>>>> RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that >>>>>> it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a >>>>>> normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the >>>>>> publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis, >>>>>> and RFC5205bis). >>>>>> >>>>>> Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on >>>>>> your plans to revise this document? >>>>>> >>>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated >>>>>> reference? >>>>>> >>>>>> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Gonzalo >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
