Thanks for all your suggestions and points of views, guys. It's much more satisfying than "just rename it" ;)
~M >From an actual game architecture perspective I agree with you, but for ease > of development I don't. > CSDKPlayer is like a second layer BasePlayer. It provides the basics, as > you > say. > > If you wanted to keep it at the same level, you should make your own > extension to the BasePlayer and just copy over any code that you are going > to use. If you're just renaming it you are just accomplishing the same > thing > as extending the class (you get all the same functionality), but your code > will mixed in and hard to maintain. Extending will provide one extra level > of inheritence which will provide no noticable difference in performance > but > will allow your code base to be cleaner and more easily maintained. > > -Skyler Clark > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
