This reminds me of my first dual xeon system.  First thing I did was
fire up a 32 player dod server running avalanche.  I wanted to see how
this thing compared to a dual amd system.

It was a dual xeon 2.8 system.

It showed the dod server only using 7% of cpu (which really equals 14%
of one).  I got so excited I nearly shat myself.

When the whole box was utilized, however, the usage seemed to change.
It got back up to 20-25% or so, like it normally would be.

You haven't run your single processor systems at full load yet.  The
task manager doesn't seem to accurately report cpu usage unless you are
close to full utilization.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
Well to be fair the P4's are all 800FSB, using PC400 ram. Compared to
the mp2400's which only run PC2100 ram, and the fsb is 266.

Both CPU's are being used, and on my original test both cpu's were at
100% on the dual.

I agree that 2 single chip systems compared to a dual, will generally
bring more performance (in my case a p4 3ghz and a p4 2.8ghz), but at
the moment  i have my p4 3ghz outperforming my dual by nearly double in
terms of cpu usage. Which just seems odd. I will be doing some more
testing this evening to get the p4 under really heavy load and see how
the ingame playability differs between the dual and the p4. I will be
attempting to  get 60+  people on the p4 this eve spread over some big
servers, ill report back the results.

The 2400's are thoroughbred.



        -----Original Message-----

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David
Fencik

        Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 17:21

        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        Cc:

        Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.







        We need to get back to the original focus of this thread.  Was
the

        chipset on the amd boards specified?



        It wouldn't be fair if you were comparing a P4 with DDR 333 to
an Athlon

        mp with DDR 233, would it?  I'm just saying that there are other
parts

        of the machine to consider besides the processor speed.



        Also...2 single processor machines are superior to 1 dual
processor

        machine in overall cpu usage.  Mapchange, however, is a
different story.



        This may sound silly, but have you verified that both cpus are
being

        used by the operating system by looking for two processors in
the task

        manager?



        I am not loyal to either brand.  I have both brands of chips and
I

        realize that both intel and amd have made some good and some bad
ones.



        Are your 2400's thoroughbred or barton cores?



        Dave



        -----Original Message-----

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike
Bradley

        Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 11:22 AM

        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.



        Each process will only run on separate CPU if you set the apps
processor

        affinity.



        -----Original Message-----

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maarten
van der

        Zwaart

        Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:03 AM

        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        Subject: Re: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.



        On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:18:11 +0100, Mark Duffy

        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        wrote:



        > Dumb question but does the software (mods and game) actually
support

        > multi processors?????



        Yes, meaning they will run on such a system. But each HLDS
instance will

        only run on one processor.



        Maarten



        --

        A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read
text.

        Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

        A: Top-posting.

        Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?





        _______________________________________________

        To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives,

        please visit:

        http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds





        _______________________________________________

        To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives,

        please visit:

        http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds







        _______________________________________________

        To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives, please visit:

        http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds









--
[ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ]
--

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to