Steam network went down. Steam network did not need to go down.
Therefore, something could have been done to prevent the Steam network from going down. That's all there is to it. We are not discussing real-world impact because this is not a list meant for that kind of discussion. This is a discussion about the Steam server platform. The network went down and players were unable to play. Why should we come up with a new infrastructure for Valve? They have 100 or so employees, they should do it themselves; it should have been done a long time ago. THAT IS THE POINT. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > All I'm seeing is whining, pettiness, and monday > morning quarterbacking. > > Lets try this. If anyone out there has a diagram of > the Valve infrastructure, and a complete > understanding of who they contract with for what > services and facilities, then lets see it. > > I only am reading people bitching about what Valve > should have done over the last 10 years, and "I > could do it better", without any reguard or > perspective on what the real world impact things may > be having in the Seattle area. > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view > the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
