Thanks for the info - do you have any idea offhand which ones would cause them to intermingle improperly?
For what it's worth, we're running the Aimbot/AutoTrigger/Spinhack detectors, Client Protection, Command Monitor, ConVar Checker, Eye Angle Test, and Anti-Speedhack SMAC modules. I don't expect you to necessarily have answers for any/all of the above, but I figure it's worth asking, especially for anyone wanting to know in the future. I did google before bothering to ask, I just came up with no prefab answers to the question. On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Kyle Sanderson <kyle.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > Depends on which SMAC modules you're planning on/are using. > > Should be fine though. > Kyle. > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Jeff Sugar <jeffsu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it safe/okay to use dblocker along with smac? Or is it like antivirus >> applications in that having more than one can result in undesirable >> complications? >> On Jan 30, 2012 4:13 AM, "Drogen Viech" <drogenvi...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Can both be used together without problems? I would disable automatic >>> banning in one of them of course. >>> >>> 2012/1/30 AnAkIn . <anakin...@gmail.com>: >>> > DBlocker can detect more cheats than SMAC. One of the most used public >>> > cheats is detected by DBlocker. >>> > >>> > >>> > 2012/1/30 Cc2iscooL <cc2isc...@gmail.com> >>> >> >>> >> I was reading the Kigen forums and a lot of people are banned for >>> >> "sv_consistency" errors, which could be as simple as just having a >>> skin on a >>> >> server that doesn't allow them. >>> >> >>> >> Hilarious. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Admin <essential...@bigpond.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> LMFAO Kigen's anticheat is obsolete and Kiegen forces you to use his >>> >>> server >>> >>> with his conditions. There is no leeway or allowances for independent >>> >>> control over banning and you are forced to kigens global banning >>> system. >>> >>> There is no decent support less being dictated too. I highly >>> recommend >>> >>> that >>> >>> one avoids this system entirely >>> >>> >>> >>> SMAC is far more superior and has no restrictions or limitations. It >>> is >>> >>> constantly updated and when an issue is found it is mostly corrected >>> >>> immediately upon the team reading the issues >>> >>> >>> >>> SMAC can be found at allied modders >>> >>> http://forums.alliedmods.net/showthread.php?t=156872 >>> >>> >>> >>> I have tried both cheat systems and found KAC to be lacking and >>> missed 8 >>> >>> out >>> >>> of ten simulated cheats. SMAC prevented 10 out of ten and allows you >>> to >>> >>> freely configure its uses without being forced to use a global >>> system. >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com >>> >>> [mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Mike @ >>> BOOM! >>> >>> Sent: Monday, 30 January 2012 12:56 PM >>> >>> To: 'Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list' >>> >>> Subject: Re: [hlds] Dealing with persistent cheaters >>> >>> >>> >>> I was like you when it came to dealing with cheaters. I was so sick >>> of >>> >>> them >>> >>> I almost stopped hosting. >>> >>> >>> >>> The came SourceBans and Kigen's AC. For the past 2+ years we have >>> used >>> >>> SourceBans: www.sourcebans.net to handle our Admin management and >>> bans >>> >>> list >>> >>> on a global community level. Banned in one server means banned in >>> all our >>> >>> servers when using SourceBans. We also use the Steambans SBSRC >>> Plugin at: >>> >>> www.steambans.com, which is another global ban list with 1000's of >>> banned >>> >>> cheater SteamIDs in it. Finally and most importantly, there are two >>> cheat >>> >>> detection plugins that block and ban a ton of cheaters for us. The >>> >>> original >>> >>> Kigen's Anticheat: http://www.kigenac.com/ SourceMod plugin >>> >>> (wonderful!!!) >>> >>> and the newer SourceMod Anticheat (SMAC), spun off of Kigen's >>> platform. >>> >>> Both >>> >>> Kigen's and SMAC integrate seamlessly with Sourcebans to perma-ban >>> >>> suspect >>> >>> cheaters without an Admin being in the server. I can't say enough >>> about >>> >>> Kigen and his wonderful work. It really has saved our asses and it's >>> very >>> >>> cool to see players being banned when they cheat when Admins are in >>> the >>> >>> server. It's like having an Admin who is spectating every player on >>> every >>> >>> server 24/7! >>> >>> >>> >>> By running a global ban management system like SourceBans and having >>> >>> real-time cheat detection of the likes of Kigen's AC or SMAC, we have >>> >>> virtually eliminated the need for Admins most of the time. Sure and >>> >>> occasional player is missed when using some cheat we can't T detect, >>> but >>> >>> this is so rare we don't worry that much about it. You can even >>> download >>> >>> the >>> >>> banlists from other communities who make them available on their >>> >>> Sourcebans >>> >>> site so you don't have to start from scratch. >>> >>> >>> >>> Check out the links and let me know if you have any questions. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com >>> >>> [mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Rob Liu >>> >>> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 5:45 PM >>> >>> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list >>> >>> Subject: Re: [hlds] Dealing with persistent cheaters >>> >>> >>> >>> Price of the game going free to play. Servers get more traffic, but >>> no >>> >>> other way to deal with persistent cheaters and griefers. Ban has >>> lost >>> >>> its >>> >>> meaning. There is nothing we can do as server owners. >>> >>> >>> >>> Valve really need to figure something out. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/30/12, hlds <h...@gmx.com> wrote: >>> >>> > I had once a problem with a guy that had many F2P accounts and as >>> >>> > provider one of the biggest from my country (dynamic IPs and >>> >>> > impossible to ban), but I was lucky to find out that he also had a >>> web >>> >>> > server hosted on his computer. I did a script to check every 5 >>> minutes >>> >>> > the IP for that site and to update a firewall rule, but usually you >>> >>> > can't do nothing, except to have some nice words for Valve and as >>> many >>> >>> admins as possible. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > I don't understand why this is not a top priority thing for Valve, >>> >>> > because a cheater with speedhack can empty a server in few >>> minutes. At >>> >>> > least we should have access to some hardware fingerprint or >>> something >>> >>> > like >>> >>> this. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com >>> >>> > [mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of >>> Alexander Z >>> >>> > Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 10:42 PM >>> >>> > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com >>> >>> > Subject: [hlds] Dealing with persistent cheaters >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > The kind with dynamic IPs, lots of F2P accounts and time to spare. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Any tips on dealing with them? >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >>> archives, >>> >>> please visit: >>> >>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >>> archives, >>> >>> please visit: >>> >>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >>> archives, >>> >>> please visit: >>> >>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> >> please visit: >>> >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Best regards, >>> > AnAkIn >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> > please visit: >>> > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> please visit: >>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
