At 10:28 22.08.2002 +0200, you wrote: >Is it only me perceiving the economic aspect of this? I can't say I like >it. > >Is it true that universal banning will be systemized via WON? E.g. a >cheater caught will be banned through WON, thus he won't be able to play >any secure servers at all. > >Is this Valves last desperate measure to squeeze out a few more bucks >from CS addicted teenagers? It's easy to make out the logics of the >following statement: >1. Cheater gets caught. >2. Cheater receives universal ban. >3. Cheater buys himself a new copy of the game, and gets a new WON-ID. >4. Valve sqeezes more money out of an elderly engine. > >And please - I'm no oracle, correct me where I'm wrong (note the word >-where-, not -if- :))
And what is wrong with this? I fail completely to see your point. The cheaters ruin the game for the rest, if Valve makes extra money on dealing with it, who cares? And an elderly engine...so what? Its still popular. Some people just have to bitch about something. DarkSpawn _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
