well,

is there an HLDS_WINDOW list?

cauz I'm really thinking of using Windows now. Who cares about 10% cpu given
to windows if I can save out 20% and give out better performance to my
clients??

What do ya think? The windows solution becoming a "think thru"?



----- Original Message -----
From: "Sindre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alfred Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Half-Life Dedicated Linux
Server Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:09 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Crazy Usage


> Have you actually tried 32 players?
> I mean, my dual mp2800+ cannot run 32 players without fps dropping below
30 on
> some maps, and I'm the kind of guy that really wants 100fps, which
shouldn't
> be that hard with such "state of the art" hardware.
> Your windows binaries are far better though, it ran the same 32 player
server
> with better performance on a Thunderbird 1400. (Yes, it was 4.1.1.1d)
>
> - Sindre
>
> >===== Original Message From Alfred Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=====
> >These are the 3 machines we actively test with. None have revealed
anywhere
> >near the CPU load other people report.
> >
> >Build Machine:
> >>gcc -v
> >Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.3/specs
> >gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
> >>uname -a
> >Linux linuxbuild2 2.2.5 #1 Fri Apr 2 16:37:56 MEST 1999 i686 unknown
> >SuSE Linux 6.1 (i386)
> >> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> >processor       : 0
> >vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
> >cpu family      : 6
> >model           : 8
> >model name      : AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2200+
> >stepping        : 0
> >cpu MHz         : 1795.387510
> >fdiv_bug        : no
> >hlt_bug         : no
> >sep_bug         : no
> >f00f_bug        : no
> >fpu             : yes
> >fpu_exception   : yes
> >cpuid level     : 1
> >wp              : yes
> >flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr 6 mce cx8 9 sep 12 pge 14 cmov
> >fcmov 17 22 mmx 24 30 3dnow
> >bogomips        : 1789.13
> >
> >GNU C Library production release version 2.0.7
> >
> >
> >64 bit build machine:
> >>gcc -v
> >Thread model: posix
> >gcc version 3.2.2 (SuSE Linux)
> >> uname -a
> >Linux 64bitcompiler 2.4.19 #1 Wed Apr 30 15:17:44 UTC 2003 x86_64 unknown
> >UnitedLinux 1.0 (AMD64)
> >> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> >processor       : 0
> >vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
> >cpu family      : 15
> >model           : 4
> >model name      : Athlon HX
> >stepping        : 0
> >cpu MHz         : 1595.496
> >cache size      : 1024 KB
> >fpu             : yes
> >fpu_exception   : yes
> >cpuid level     : 1
> >wp              : yes
> >flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca
> >cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext lm 3dnowext
3dnow
> >bogomips        : 3185.04
> >TLB size        : 1088 4K pages
> >clflush size    : 64
> >address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> >power management: ts ttp
> >
> >GNU C Library stable release version 2.2.5
> >
> >
> >Test1:
> >>uname -a
> >Linux alfred_linux 2.4.19-16mdkcustom #3 Fri Feb 21 14:26:04 PST 2003
i686
> >unknown unknown GNU/Linux
> >Mandrake Linux release 9.0 (dolphin) for i586
> >>cat /proc/cpuinfo
> >processor       : 0
> >vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> >cpu family      : 6
> >model           : 5
> >model name      : Pentium II (Deschutes)
> >stepping        : 1
> >cpu MHz         : 400.914
> >cache size      : 512 KB
> >fdiv_bug        : no
> >hlt_bug         : no
> >f00f_bug        : no
> >coma_bug        : no
> >fpu             : yes
> >fpu_exception   : yes
> >cpuid level     : 2
> >wp              : yes
> >flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca
> >cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr
> >bogomips        : 799.53
> >
> >
> >GNU C Library stable release version 2.2.5
> >
> >
> >
> >dual_bereta_r0x wrote:
> >> Alfred Reynolds wrote:
> >>> The "stats" command uses the value from /proc/<pid>/stat , which is
> >>> the same value that top uses. Perhaps the difference you are
> >>> encountering is due to the sampling intervals (hlds smoothes the
> >>> usage over a 5 second window but top simply shows the instantaneous
> >>> value).
> >>>
> >>> - Alfred
> >>
> >> Would you mind to send us what are the base distro used by Valve to
> >> test/deploy hlds? I mean, kernel version, glibc, utils, and stuff.
> >> Even if we hack all the possible distros and kernels, we could have
> >> YOURS as a base value.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please
> visit:
> >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to