In practice only server with faked info would be delisted (didn’t did you read the blog post?) because those are the kind of servers that will receive lots of connections but also lots of disconnects. The threshold for delisting would have to be very low to delist servers for just being unpopular. But none of us really knows, we can only speculate.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Brian Rak <d...@devicenull.org> wrote: >>Then every major GSP will have to forbid hacking servers to inflate >>the player count if they want to protect their addresses. Which is of >>course great. > > Umm, no. Given that this new system doesn't actually check for fake players > (did you actually read the news post?), GSP's would have to forbid anything > that could possibly make players unhappy with the server. This includes: any > sort of plugin, any sort of custom map, any sort of admin access (a banned > player is not a happy player). So no, that's not a likely solution. > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
