I prefer the Steam trading system. 2012/2/17 hlds <h...@gmx.com>: > We had two trading mechanism, one being fast and quite reliable (if we can > use this word for something related to Steam/TF2), while the other allowing > advanced trades (more than 8 items + trading games etc...), but being slow > and failing many times. Now we have only one. I didn't know that removing a > feature used by many players is a good thing... > > I understand Valve's point of view (is easier to maintain and improve one > mechanism instead of having two), but why is this "a good thing" for others? > > -----Original Message----- > From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com > [mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of doc > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:44 AM > To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Mandatory Team Fortress 2 Update Released > > For every complaint that gets filed I'd like to vote FOR steam > overlay/inventory trading. I think it's a good thing and more importantly: > haters gotta hate. > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Frank <ad...@gamerscrib.net> wrote: > >> To be honest I was expecting a roll-back to at least the Option of having >> in-game trade overlay returned. >> Can someone at least reply if this is being looked at after all the >> opposition and complaints its gotten? >> >> On another note glad to see the client crashes fixed and the server > restart >> requests..very much appreciated! >> >> Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
-- Best regards, AnAkIn _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
