In message <alpine.deb.2.00.1110100812380.11...@uplift.swm.pp.se> Mikael Abrahamsson writes: > On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Shishio Tsuchiya wrote: > > > 2^64 host address space would be too enough for homenet. > > I would just like to comment on this even though you retracted your > question. > > As an ISP, I do not want to participate in a home with hundreds or > thousands of active IPv6 addresses that I need to keep state for. Most > likely, when we have central equipment participating in a home network, > we'll implement a limit on number of neighbours it'll allow on the subnet. > Doing ND/NS a lot takes resources. > > If customer wants to use more IPv6 addresses, we'll require them to get a > home router and PD address space to it to distribute the ND/NS load. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
+1 violent agreement, etc IMO the ground rules are: The ISP provides one prefix. The homenet subdivides it only if there are multiple subnets. The ISP doesn't see the longer prefixes that exist only within the homenet. Curtis _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
