In my v6 ops presentation in Beijing, Dave Thaler agreed with you (James). I'm on the other side of the argument.
tom From: james woodyatt <j...@apple.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:33:26 -0700 To: Ray Bellis <ray.bel...@nominet.org.uk> Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [homenet] routing requirements On Oct 24, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Ray Bellis wrote: Will those arguing for ND Proxy please stand up and be counted? I have long complained that certain WPAN physical layers should be prepared to attach to home networks, either by application layer gateways on bastion hosts, or by dedicated ND/RD proxy devices, rather than by demanding that every residential network deploy a standard zero configuration prefix delegation and routing protocol to interface to these peculiar WPAN networks. I know I'm in the minority on this. I don't think I can point to anyone who agrees with me. Still, I should be counted. -- james woodyatt <j...@apple.com> member of technical staff, core os networking _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
