On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > > Admit defeat and either bridge everything or route longer-than-/64 prefixes. > I hope it won't come to that.
I would prefer to deploy NAPT66 rather than route prefixes longer than /64. In fact, I'm tempted to to say we should prefer to deploy NAPT66 wherever the service provider delegates anything longer than /48, so that we can route /48 prefixes uniformly across the entire home network. -- james woodyatt <[email protected]> member of technical staff, core os networking
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
