On Oct 25, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > Sure, that optimizes routing, but it forces applications to be more complex. > Do you really want all the STUN / TURN / ICE code that we have today to keep > being necessary?
That's all going to be necessary anyway because of the ubiquitous deployment of RFC 6092 in default-enabled configurations. Applications are already going to be forced to cope with that complexity, so why not simplify addressing an use NAPT66 on the ULA prefix? -- james woodyatt <j...@apple.com> member of technical staff, core os networking
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
