On 11/16/11 15:41 , Fred Baker wrote: > I don't much care whose charter it's in. I do think that if we have > an idea that an ISP will allocate an IA_PD to a directly attached > router and that router will then, in some way, sub-allocate subnet > prefixes to subnets in the home, then there is a case in which there > are multiple ISPs that have separate routers doing that. Ralph and I > have suggested using the same mechanism that ISPs use to allocate > prefixes to the home to allocate prefixes within the home, which > means having multiple DHCP servers.
which seems like a slightly more eleborate variation of having multiple available routers or nexthops due to having multiple RAs. If we do it another way, whether > ZOSPF's or some other way, we have the same problem in the sense that > there will be multiple sources of subnet prefixes. > > On Nov 16, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Ted Lemon wrote: > >> On Nov 16, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Ole Troan <o...@cisco.com> wrote: >>> extend the DHCP protocol to handle multiple sources of >>> information. >> >> I think this winds up being implicit in MIF's charter, although I >> didn't realize that until quite recently. > > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list > homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
