On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > >>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Chown <t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk> writes: > Tim> It's good to see some traction in service discovery and naming. > > Tim> We also have a fifth area, security. The text as it stands > Tim> says a few things that apply to this area, e.g. > > There are two categories: security services provided by homenet. > (Your a-d). And security required by homenet. (Your (e)). > > Let's keep those two sections seperate!
I was about to commenting on the same, that we have two different security settings here. About security for end-users, why should it be deny by default? It don't really rise the security level by much since virus/trojans get in through user initiated action, and out again just as easy in the background. -- Roger Jorgensen | rog...@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | ro...@jorgensen.no _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
