On 2/20/13 7:49 PM, David Lamparter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:40:25PM +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Michael Richardson
<mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>wrote:
Would/could another foot of such a network be on the IETF network?
If the IETF network didn't respond to DHCPv6 PD requests, it wouldn't be
much use.
Even without DHCPv6 PD on the remainder of the IETF network, it might be
possible to get a /52../56 and run a DHCPv6 PD ourselves, emulating part
of the provider network.
that's a straight forward request to the noc, that said time is getting
tight so if you want support for your experiment during the meeting I'd
reach out expeditiously.
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
