Not sure I buy the security model angle, IPv4 NAT != security. It would be great if we had a group working on service discoveryŠoh wait!?
========================================= John Jason Brzozowski Comcast Cable m) 484-962-0060 e) john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com o) 609-377-6594 w) www.comcast6.net ========================================= -----Original Message----- From: Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com> Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:06 PM To: Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> Cc: John Jason Brzozowski <john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com>, David Lamparter <equi...@diac24.net>, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, Mark Townsley <m...@townsley.net>, Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@piuha.net> Subject: Re: [homenet] Running code in Orlando >On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > >I still find the dynamicism required by renting ipv6 addresses to so >impact in so many aspects of the "sane usage of stuff like printers", and >naming, and the security model as to *demand* ipv6 nat in the home... > > > >Sigh. > > > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
