On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Mark Townsley <m...@townsley.net> wrote:
> > Great idea. I won't be in Orlando, but I am fairly sure there is nothing > > I would do there that cares about address persistency, apart from > > having to reconnect to jabber maybe. Conducting an RFC 4192 procedure > > on Tuesday night and a flash IPv6 renumbering during Thursday morning > > would be very interesting! > > We might as well toss in some ULAs as well. > Hmm. Do we know for sure that all clients properly depref ULAs below global addresses (either because they follow RFC6724 instead of RFC3484, or because they implement the longest prefix matching rule?) If not, some clients might break.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
