In message <cakd1yr3uxm4jwcsedudltvy2espx4fzorsorcrb8bs-8wxj...@mail.gmail.com> , Lorenzo Colitti writes: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > > > Hmm. Do we know for sure that all clients properly depref ULAs below > > global > > > addresses (either because they follow RFC6724 instead of RFC3484, or > > > because they implement the longest prefix matching rule?) If not, some > > > clients might break. > > > > Longest match works well enough 2001/2002 have 14 bits in common. > > fc00 has no bits in common with 2001 or 2002. I've been using ULA > > PA addresses together at home for years without issue. > > > > Which is why I asked whether we know for sure that all clients implement > it. Do we?
Does it matter? There will presumably be a ssid without all the experimentation going to fallback to. The only question is this a opt-in or opt-out experiment? Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
