On 08/10/2014 06:51, Michael Richardson wrote: > Mark Townsley <m...@townsley.net> wrote: > >> I suggest that ANIMA focus on "professionally-managed" networks first, > >> with "Homenet" being a secondary consideration, akin to IPv4 is in the > >> homenet WG. > > > I like that suggestion, with a caveat. The caveat being that I think > > there is room for a "professionally managed" home network as well - > > something homenet to date has touched on, but for the most part > > avoided. > > Sure; we have avoided it because I think most see the only professional > nearby being the ISP, and few of *us* professionals want them mucking around > in our home. That's the personal experience of IETF contributors as > individuals.
As far as the Anima charter goes (see subject line), we need to use the use cases to *test* the Anima technical choices (when we make them) against the real world. So eventually we'd need all kinds of use cases, which is why the charter mentions a wide scope. But we need to start with a finite task, which is why the charter mentions a couple of specific cases. Brian _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet