Mark Townsley <m...@townsley.net> wrote:
> meeting slot the following day. This included technical discussion
> around a partially unanticipated requirement for HNCP to support a stub
> network with a gateway that doesn't have sufficient resources to run a
> routing protocol.
I am still skeptical that there isn't just a lot of fear for the cost of the
simple announcement of the stub network. I think that the announcement of a
stub network, where all outbound traffic goes to one or more announced
default routes, shoudln't be that difficult...
Aside from security involvement (which I think is about HNCP anyway), I think
that it's just crafting a single packet to send out periodically. Am I wrong
here?
> The two currently available routing protocols are IS-IS and Babel but
I'm not complaining that OSPFv3 is not on the list, but I'm unclear why it
isn't there anymore.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
pgpxB_ZFGglgQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
