>> Is there interest in a stub-only implementation of Babel? Should it be >> a standalone daemon, or should it be integrated in the HNCP daemon?
> I think the most interesting thing would be reference code which implements > stub-only babel; does it even need to listen? Yes, it needs (1) to discover a default route and (2) to participate in the request/response sub-protocol (by replying "I have no idea" to any requests it gets). Point (2) avoids a timeout when clearing a retracted route from the network. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
