> If people want to choose babel because it works well facing adverse radio
> conditions in a mesh-networking environment (that I know nothing about),
I think this is misrepresenting the argument somewhat.
We want a routing protocol that works well in an unadministered network
that consists of a mixture of wired and wireless links. In a previous
mail, I presented a topology that I think is realistic in a Homenet
deployment:
Internet --- A --- B....C --- is Ethernet
. . ... is WiFi
........
Current implementations of Babel are known to work well in such topologies.
As far as I am aware, current implementations of IS-IS are not. Getting
IS-IS to work well on such topologies is not completely trivial.
-- Juliusz
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
