On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Ray Hunter wrote:
I think there are two completely separate mechanisms being discussed here: the need for rapid failover to a previously known alternative address for your partner device, and discovering the alternative addresses of your partner.
Agree.
The one thing I think that is still missing in the discussion is caching in the name space. Whether name resolution of the remote partner address be done via mDNS, DNS, or monitoring the currently established channel between partner nodes like in shim6, whatever.
I think we need this done via the existing channel, a la MP-TCP and SHIM6. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
