Ralph Droms wrote:
On Apr 7, 2015, at 6:47 AM 4/7/15, Juliusz
Chroboczek<j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:
The DT will be chartered as below.
I find the lack of the words "working code", "implementation experience"
or "experimental data" somewhat disquieting.
+1 I'd like to see a DT with hands on experience of running Homenet code
before IETF 93 in Prague, and that they give this appropriate weight in
any considerations.
I think the umbrella direction for requirements could be considered to cover
those specifics:
For the design team to make this determination, it shall first
understand the use-cases for homenet and derive routing requirements
from those.
Terry - you might consider adding a pointer to RFC 7368 as an explicit source
of input for the requirements.
+1 The WG achieved rough consensus on Section 3.5 of RFC 7368. That
should be the baseline for any beauty contest of routing protocols for
Homenet.
- Ralph
With frustrated regards,
-- Juliusz Chroboczek
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
