On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Ray Hunter <v6...@globis.net> wrote: > Terry - you might consider adding a pointer to RFC 7368 as an explicit source > of input for the requirements. > > +1 The WG achieved rough consensus on Section 3.5 of RFC 7368. That > should be the baseline for any beauty contest of routing protocols for > Homenet. >
+1, although one would hope that it goes without saying that a routing protocol that does not meet the requirements in RFC 7368 cannot be chosen.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
