Concerning the /128-on-loopback issue...
The HNCP draft is not quite clear about the semantics of the NODE-ADDRESS
TLV (Section 6.3 of -06). Is that for on-link addresses only?
In other words, is it legal for a router to grab an address from a prefix
assigned by some other router (not necessarily a neighbour), advertise it
over NODE-ADDRESS, assign it to one if its interfaces, and advertise the
/128 over Babel?
If it's legal and doesn't cause any issues I don't see, then that pretty
much solves this particular problem.
-- Juliusz
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
