>This is why I think it would be great if the deprecated prefix >continued to be sent (in RA and HNCP) until its original valid lifetime >expired. The problem is that the valid lifetime can be several years so I don't think that is very practical unless we want to also enforce an upper bound on announced lifetimes which is starting to feel a bit uncomfortable. That's why I think an upper limit like the 2h makes sense. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Tim Chown
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Steven Barth
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Dave Taht
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Steven Barth
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Tore Anderson
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Steven Barth
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DH... Steven Barth
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DH... Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Tore Anderson
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DH... Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DH... Tore Anderson
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Steven Barth
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Steven Barth
- Re: [homenet] HNCP, RA and DHCPv4 Mikael Abrahamsson