>>> SHNCPD is good for a few first tests, but it only contains a subset of >>> the useful HomeNet features.
>> Huh? What useful features are missing? > What is about the interaction of SHNCPD with (M)DNS? Right, SD and NAT-PMP proxying are not implemented by shncpd. > Can I add the hybrid-proxy and expect it to work? No idea. Markus? What needs to be done for the integration? -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
