That is a separate discussion. We can't standardize on a process that doesn't yet exist.
On Dec 12, 2016 1:59 PM, "james woodyatt" <j...@google.com> wrote: > On Dec 12, 2016, at 07:46, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > > > I'm not in love with this as an end solution, but it has the advantage > that the IAB controls .arpa, and so we can get an unsecure delegation right > away assuming the IAB agrees. I see no reason to think they would not. > It's a bit more typing, and there is the problem that the fourth google > result for arpa is "Advanced Research Projects Agency. But it would work, > and quickly, and would keep the whole process in the family. > > > A third available option is to obtain a new “regular” top-level domain for > IAB to control that has a better name than “arpa.” and use that for the > insecure delegation to the “home” subdomain. > > > --james woodyatt <j...@google.com> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > homenet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > >
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
