I have read homenet-naming.

It wasn't quite the document I was expecting.
But rather seems to leverage upon a number of other draft-sctl* documents in 
progress.

What are the plans for draft-sctl-*?
and then there is draft-ietf-mid-mpvd-ndp-support as a normative reference.
Will homenet will to adopt that too?

So it seems that I have to read the other documents in detail before I can
make any clear opinion as to how this all fits together.
(I think I've missed the last two homenet WG meetings due to conflicts; I
should watch them on meetecho recording to learn more I guess)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to