Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote:
> to put the CFA on hold pending that update. There have been some good
> comments already, though; in particular, I think Juliusz' point that it
> would
> be nice to actually try some of this in practice is good, and is what
> I'm
We require interoperable implementations for Internet Standard, not to adopt
a document. Implementation reports would be good for WGLC, not here!
We need to lower the bar here, not raise it. WGs can abandon documents too.
> That said, what I said in the working group is that we've been spinning
> our wheels on this for several years, and I wanted to know if the scope
> of this is reasonable and is what the working group wants to take
> on. If it's not,
> then I don't actually know how to proceed.
I think that it's the right approach, and given the sort out of the MVDP,
I support adoption.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
