> I wanted to know if the scope of this is reasonable and is what the
> working group wants to take on.
I think the scope of this is too wide. It tries to solve a number of
different problems:
1. naming within the Homenet;
2. publishing names of Homenet nodes outside the Homenet;
3. resolving names outside the Homenet in the presence of multiple providers;
4. announcing multiple providers' naming spaces when the providers
provide inconsistent information.
My gut feeling is that if you insist on a single protocol that solves all
four, you'll end up with more complexity than if you solve each problem on
its own.
> If it's not, then I don't actually know how to proceed.
I suggest picking just one problem and solving it. (1) in the above list
would be the obvious choice.
-- Juliusz
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
