Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> writes: > Why do you want it to be optional? What problem are you trying to solve? > Do you not know how to do it? Do you think it's resource intensive? Do you > think it reduces reliability more than not doing it?
Because I'm not convinced the added implementation complexity is worth it; so yeah, the last one I guess... -Toke _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
