Kate - you're probably correct, we are using the person you referred us to, so there should be no surprises there.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Kate Chapman <kate.chap...@hotosm.org> wrote: > Hi Martijn, > > HOT has a conflict of interest policy prepared by I believe the same legal > expert. It was required to apply for 501(c)(3) status and signed by the > board at the time. > > On the road so can't look it up at the moment. > > Kate > On Mar 12, 2015 12:37 PM, "Martijn van Exel" <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > >> The OSM US board has just agreed on a COI policy that was prepared by a >> legal expert. I can see if I can get you a copy if that would help? >> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Harry Wood <m...@harrywood.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> > I believe conflicts should be handled in the follow 2 basic ways. >>> > >>> > 1. Potential conflicts should be talked about and acknowledged well >>> > before any actual conflicts arise. >>> > 2. Board members should completely recuse themselves from any >>> > conversation. They should not listen to or be a part of the >>> conversation >>> > during any activities where a conflict exist. >>> > >>> >>> Yep. Those are the rules. It's quite difficult to follow if the topic >>> about which you have a conflict of interest, is something coming up a lot >>> in board discussions. So in your case Dale, if the board were needing to >>> discuss ARC a lot, then you might have to recuse yourself a lot. That's a >>> bit awkward but not impossible. >>> >>> We found it very difficult in the past having HOT paid staff members on >>> the board, particularly as they didn't always seem to understand and accept >>> these rules. I guess it was understandable that they wanted to take >>> strategic decisions about the projects and parts of the organisation which >>> most effected them and their (HOT staff) work. >>> >>> Can be tricky. >>> >>> >>> > As such I'll be posting my conflicts to the Board Election Wiki >>> > and encourage others to do the same. >>> >>> >>> I called mine a "Declaration of interests" and linked it off my user >>> page rather than off the elections wiki (but that's partly because, I was >>> *on* the board when I wrote it. Also it serves just as well as a >>> declaration for anyone looking at me as a OSMF CWG member) >>> >>> >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Harry_Wood/Declaration_of_Interests >>> >>> Maybe that's useful as a template. Direct financial interests (who pays >>> you) is the most important thing for people to be aware of, but I tried to >>> think of other affiliations I have which might conflict. I also noted when >>> it was last updated, since this information can obviously go out of date. >>> >>> Harry >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HOT mailing list >>> HOT@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Martijn van Exel >> skype: mvexel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HOT mailing list >> HOT@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >> >> -- Martijn van Exel skype: mvexel
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot