I've used the mass validation technique before and you can pick up a fair chunk of stuff doing it plus it's faster than going through the tiles to validate. For road networks and rivers its actually a lot better as some mappers only map to the edge of the tile and the next mapper doesn't realise its important.
Cheerio John On 24 April 2016 at 11:15, Blake Girardot HOT/OSM <blake.girar...@hotosm.org > wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Really helpful insight on what is contributing to the issues, the > imagery change, we need to look at how to minimize that through better > instructions as well as validation folks need to be aware they should > be using all the available imagery when working. > > Mass validation outside of the TM as a process is not affected by > imagery, I would load up all the imagery layers while working on it. > We are always validating the data and trying to figure out what > imagery was used when it was mapped is always part of that process. > > The imagery should not really affect things like common road network > problems. > > Really mass validation is no different than any other validation, just > doing much larger areas at once, perhaps doing it step wise (roads > first, buildings second, etc) and maybe bringing other tools > potentially to the process. > > > cheers > blake > ---------------------------------------------------- > Blake Girardot > Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team > Vice President, HOT Board of Directors > skype: jblakegirardot > HOT Core Team Contact: i...@hotosm.org > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Mike Dupont > <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > the validation problems that I have seen are with changes between > versions > > of imagery. It might be good against bing but not against the last images > > post event. No automated process will pick that up. > > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Blake Girardot HOT/OSM > > <blake.girar...@hotosm.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Humberto and John, > >> > >> I really encourage you to look at ways of doing large scale validations. > >> > >> One way I have done it in the past is to download the tasking manager > >> either project area, or even the individual task square outlines and > >> load them up in JOSM, then just do large scale validation of the area > >> using the task outlines as a guide. > >> > >> If it is my project, and it is archived, I won't bother to mark the > >> task squares as validated individually, I just validate the whole AoI. > >> If I was better at things, I would actually put in a note in the > >> instructions, even on the archived project that says it was 100% > >> validated outside of the TM. > >> > >> (allowing validators to mark mass task squares as validated would be > >> an improvement to the TM. Would be nice to checkout mass task squares > >> too for the most experienced validators and project managers to work > >> on) > >> > >> If it is not my project, I will mass validate 5 or 10 task squares at > >> a time, then just go into the project and review, mark valid, review, > >> mark valid, etc all the task squares I validated en mass with JOSM. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> blake > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------- > >> Blake Girardot > >> Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team > >> Vice President, HOT Board of Directors > >> skype: jblakegirardot > >> HOT Core Team Contact: i...@hotosm.org > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 4:01 PM, hyan...@gmail.com <hyan...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hello John, > >> > > >> > 2016-04-24 8:51 GMT-05:00 John Whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com>: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I'm seeing projects archived fairly quickly without validation. > >> >> > >> > > >> > A team of validators will start with this ones from tomorrow, with the > >> > objective to review and validate all this squares. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Of the validation I have done I've seen crossing ways and highways > >> >> almost > >> >> meeting on a project that was supposed to be Highways only for > >> >> experienced > >> >> JOSM users. > >> >> > >> > Yes, I'm seen task marks as done with any update too. Thanks for your > >> > validations. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> JOSM validation should have highlighted these errors before > uploading. > >> > > >> > > >> > Yes... > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> I won't bother to mention the other problems I've seen but I assume > >> >> some > >> >> thought has been given to the matter? > >> >> > >> > Yes, as I mention before, a group of validators start from tomorrow, > >> > thanks > >> > for your welcome comments. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Thanks John > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> HOT mailing list > >> >> HOT@openstreetmap.org > >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > HOT mailing list > >> > HOT@openstreetmap.org > >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> HOT mailing list > >> HOT@openstreetmap.org > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot > > > > > > > > > > -- > > James Michael DuPont > > Kansas Linux Fest http://kansaslinuxfest.us > > Free/Libre Open Source and Open Knowledge Association of Kansas > > http://openkansas.us > > Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://www.flossk.org > > Saving Wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion > http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com > > _______________________________________________ > HOT mailing list > HOT@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot >
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
