Rather than use morança=yes, I would propose morança as value of the key 'place'. Furthermore, in Africa, usually place=* is assigned to a point, located in the center of a residential area, while is uncommon to find it as tag of that area. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place The simplest and most widespread way to map most place types is to position a node roughly at it's center (for a populated place having a central town hall, square or similar (far from all do), preferably there though).
In my opinion, I would be mapping them as residential areas and putting a point with place=isolated_dwellings or similar. If needed, I would add something like: description=Morança https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description By the way, I totally agree about security. This is by far the most important thing and should be the main concern while mapping those areas. Buon lavoro, Michael Michael Montani GIS Consultant, Data and Visualization Unit Service for Geospatial Information and Telecommunications Technologies United Nations Global Service Centre United Nations Department of Operational Support Brindisi | Phone: +39 0831 056985 | Mobile: +39 3297193455 | Intermission: 158 6985 | E-mail: michael.mont...@un.org<mailto:m...@un.org> [cid:part4.54241C7A.EC779C46@un.org] On 24/02/20 12:40, Donal Hunt wrote: There does not appear to be much documentation around the concept of moranças. In OSM, it's normal to propose a method for mapping this data and requesting review of the proposal. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process The only other comment I have at this time is whether there are any concerns around data protection / security given the ability to identify groups of individuals. If I was doing this in Ireland, I would not add surnames to residential houses even if the data was available / permissions was granted. Specifically, on the tagging question. landuse=residential; morança=yes; name=<name> does seem a reasonable approach. You may also want to look at place=neighbourhood or boundary=administrative (the latter does have an entry for Guinea but not Guinea Bissau). A review of tags already in use for the country may help identify a good approach. Regards Donal On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 at 15:16, mbranco2 <mbran...@gmail.com<mailto:mbran...@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear List, I'm involved in a project with an Italian high school (IIS A.Avogadro, Turin) mapping N'Tchangue area in Guinea Bissau. After completing the related HOT project (#7151), we're going to add detatils to the Map (schools, health center, water wells...) having this informations from a NGO (Abalalite) which works there. Abalalite is giving us information (the name) also about moranças, settlements of family clans (they range since 2 to 30 houses). As you can see in picture [1], moranças are very close each other, all together they form the hamlet/village named T'Changue. We'd like to know your opinion how is the best way to map moranças: - setting the name tag directly on landuse=residential area (maybe adding a "morança=yes" tag? It seems to me it's a specificity, to be areas inhabited by family clans) - adding the name to place=isolated_dwelling/hamlet tag (not sure it's a good idea to put so many hamlets so close each other; also, all together they are a village...) - or ... ? Thank you for your opinion, Marco (mbranco2) [1] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/N%27tchangue_Moran%C3%A7as.jpg _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org<mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org<mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
