I assume you are just referring to the CAR file method? I did this on the last upgrade and it got royally hosed, I basically ended up redoing everything.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Mike G <[email protected]> wrote: > I prefer to archive current cf admin settings for each instance. Uninstall. > Install. Import settings checking paths before deploy. I would be surprised > if this does not work for X upgrade. I don't think an upgrade in pla e > would have a happy outcome. > On Mar 11, 2011 4:48 PM, "Aaron Rouse" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd be curious how well an upgrade ends up working from CF9 multi-server > > installation to CF10. I am betting it will have some flukiness to it. I > > really don't think our purchasing folks look at the details down to > > something like jboss v. jrun. Now the IT folks who just want any reason > at > > all to kill CF, I am sure would use that as an arguing point against it. > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Mike G <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> At least until CFX.01.... but honestly, jboss will likely be as > invisible > >> as jrun has been. When is the last time MOST of us have logged into the > jrun > >> console? I think the problem most big companies will have will be in the > >> procurement office. Jboss is open source. No one to pay for support > unless > >> adobe is going to offer jboss support to cfx customers. IT procurement > >> loves to pay for maint support. > >> On Mar 11, 2011 2:19 PM, "Ajas Mohammed" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Thanks Mark for sharing this. > >> > > >> > My first thought is we have CF 9 enterprise now and I guess if we move > to > >> CF > >> > X, during installation, the installer will take over from JRUN and > >> configure > >> > Tomcat on our servers. I am certain lot of folks would say lets wait > on > >> > this. :-) > >> > > >> > > >> > <Ajas Mohammed /> > >> > http://ajashadi.blogspot.com > >> > We cannot become what we need to be, remaining what we are. > >> > No matter what, find a way. Because thats what winners do. > >> > You can't improve what you don't measure. > >> > Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high > intention, > >> > sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it > >> represents > >> > the wise choice of many alternatives. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Mark Davis <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Not sure how many here have seen this? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > http://www.coldfusionjedi.com/index.cfm/2011/3/3/ColdFusion-X-Writeup > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Today at Scotch on the Rocks, Adam Lehman released some tidbits about > >> the > >> >> upcoming new release of ColdFusion, ColdFusion X. I tweeted as much > as > >> >> possible, but for those who don't use Twitter, and for those who want > a > >> >> general one page summary they can comment on, here is what he said > and > >> my > >> >> opinion where applicable. Please note that anything announced today > >> could > >> >> easily change between now and the real release. Also remember these > >> notes > >> >> are based on my memory of what Adam said. Any mistakes are my fault. > >> >> > >> >> 1) Verity will be removed. > >> >> > >> >> Not much to say about this. Adam suggested anyone using Verity now > >> should > >> >> begin looking into transitioning to Solr. Even if Verity wasn't being > >> >> removed I think most people would recommend this anyway. Verity *was* > a > >> >> good product. I don't think it got the credit it deserved. But it's > >> ancient > >> >> now and Solr is much more capable. > >> >> > >> >> 2) JRun is being removed in favor of Tomcat. > >> >> > >> >> Not much to say about this one. I've used Tomcat before and it seems > ok > >> - > >> >> but I've had issues with it and Apache. Hopefully that won't be a > >> problem. > >> >> Adam said - multiple times - that Adobe would be supporting Tomcat so > >> that > >> >> if you had issues with ColdFusion and Tomcat you won't be left out in > >> the > >> >> cold. I'm guessing this will be a slightly painful transition the > >> *first*time and then after that - not much of a big deal. Unofficial > reports > >> are > >> >> that ColdFusion runs much faster over Tomcat so any 'free' speed > boost > >> is a > >> >> good thing. > >> >> > >> >> 3) Webservices updated to Axis 2. > >> >> > >> >> Anyone who does much with web services in ColdFusion will know that > it's > >> >> use of Axis 1 leads to issues with many service providers. ColdFusion > X > >> will > >> >> upgrade Axis to 2.latest while keeping support for Axis 1 as well. It > >> was > >> >> suggested that in ColdFusion 11 Axis 1 would go away completely. This > >> update > >> >> will help enable Exchange 2010 support. > >> >> > >> >> 4) Scheduled tasks updated. > >> >> > >> >> Scheduled tasks will support chaining (run task B when A is done), > >> >> conditions (don't run if CPU is 80% busy), priority, and grouping > >> (consider > >> >> A, B, and C a group and do this to them as a whole). Also - finally - > >> you > >> >> will be able to make them application specific. > >> >> > >> >> 5) Jobs > >> >> > >> >> Basically you wrap a set of code in a cfjob tag and it runs > >> asynchronously. > >> >> It gets added to a queue you can introspect and modify. Basically a > >> >> shorthand for cfthread but with more control over the queue stack. > >> >> > >> >> 6) Java loader/proxies. > >> >> > >> >> No more need for JavaLoader - you can now load jars/classes via a > This > >> >> scope attribute in the Application scope. On the Java side, your Java > >> code > >> >> can create an interface from a CFC. Both seem like really nice, > useful > >> >> updates. > >> >> > >> >> 7) Closures. > >> >> > >> >> Ok, I'm on the fence on this one. I load closures in JavaScript. I > >> honestly > >> >> don't know how much I'd use them in a server side language. I'm sure > >> I'll > >> >> regret saying that though and I bet I'll wonder how I ever lived > without > >> >> them. Then again, it could end up being the next cfinterface. It was > >> hinted > >> >> that the implementation could be similar to what Mark blogged< > >> http://blog.mxunit.org/2010/01/what-would-your-cfml-look-like-with.html > >about > >> a few months ago. > >> > >> >> > >> >> 8) HTML5/jquery > >> >> > >> >> Nothing concrete was said here, but it was stressed that HTML5 and > >> jQuery > >> >> would be supported in big ways. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston > >> >> ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. > >> >> To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > >> >> For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston > >> ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. > >> > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > >> > For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston > >> ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. > >> To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > >> For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Aaron Rouse > > http://www.happyhacker.com/ > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston > ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. > > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > > For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston > ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en > -- Aaron Rouse http://www.happyhacker.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston ColdFusion Users' Group" discussion list. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/houcfug?hl=en
