ht://Dig got better results on my survey. People complained about
SWISH and phrases, indexing, etc. They do have a nice mailing list,
though.
Info is at <http://www.searchtools.com/surveys/survey-ratings-02.html>
Avi
At 11:35 AM +0100 10/28/99, Philip Coates wrote:
>Does anyone know of any benchmark tests comparing performance and
>functionality of SWISH++ vs ht://Dig?
>
>I only ask because a client has mentioned SWISH++ as a possible alternative.
>I guess that from the Web stats (I have heard very little mention of SWISH++
>in the outside world) there is the suggestion that it's a tool of choice. I
>had a look at it and it didn't seem to be terribly well documented (yeah,
>source-code documentation, but I want to USE the product, not mess around
>inside its code...). Just wondered really whether anyone had any OBJECTIVE
>comments they could add, or perhaps knew of somewhere I could maybe find out
>some of this?
>
>Regards,
>
>Phil Coates.
>
>NoHo Digital
>Floor 2, Canberra House
>315-317 Regent St
>London W1R 7YB
>
>phone: 44(0)207 299 3425
>mobile: 44(0)7711 818 384
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http: www.noho.co.uk
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from the htdig mailing list, send a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word unsubscribe in
>the SUBJECT of the message.
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the single word unsubscribe in
the SUBJECT of the message.
