Tim Fletcher wrote: >> Tim, mind if I add you as a member (committer) to this project? You >> certainly have earned it! > > Sure, thanks.
done >> Note: while there is some obvious benefits to keeping the high level >> design of the two implementations in sync, I have no interest in drawing >> attention to language differences. If there are obvious Ruby idioms >> that can make a given section of code smaller or clearer, then by all >> means, such idioms should be used. > > Yes, there are parts that could be made more Rubyish. Go for it! Just keep the tests passing. Extra credit for the creation of more tests. :-) Don't be shy. What I did was mostly glorified searches and replaces, coupled with some isolated fixes/minor rewrites to get the majority of the tests to pass. ANY improvements would be appreciated. I'll even backport any particularly good changes back to the Python version - Sam Ruby --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "html5lib-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/html5lib-discuss?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
