Ryan King wrote:
> On May 19, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Tim Fletcher wrote:
>>> Note: while there is some obvious benefits to keeping the high level
>>> design of the two implementations in sync, I have no interest in  
>>> drawing
>>> attention to language differences.  If there are obvious Ruby idioms
>>> that can make a given section of code smaller or clearer, then by all
>>> means, such idioms should be used.
>> Yes, there are parts that could be made more Rubyish.
> 
> In terms of making things more rubyish, I have a rubyforge that I  
> setup for this [1].

[1] http://rubyforge.org/projects/html5/

That would be cool!

- Sam Ruby

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"html5lib-discuss" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/html5lib-discuss?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to