Looks like we need an RC4. Mike
On 8/25/05, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 12:09 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > Folks, > > > > There are three issues that I think we need to discuss: > > > > Folks, > This is my take for what it is worth. > > > (1) I inquired with the Jakarta PMC regarding the possibility of the > > project name change (Jakarta HttpClient -> Jakarta Http). The reaction was > > overwhelming negative, primarily due to high likelihood of branding > > conflict with Apache HTTPD, which is a very valid point. We have several > > options here: > > > > (1.1) leave Jakarta and join another TLP (either Apache Tomcat or Apache > > HTTPD) where _might_ be permitted to call the project jHTTP or some such > > sort > > (1.2) stay with Jakarta and try to come up with a radically different > > project name > > (1.3) essentially do nothing and keep the same name. In this case we are > > likely to not be permitted to release any lightweight HTTP server or proxy > > under Jakarta name > > > > My preference is to stay with Jakarta. The amount of trouble I have had > getting HttpClient promoted from a component in Commons to a full > project in Bugzilla was enormous. I personally do not have any strength > left to go through the same exercise again. I am for 1.2 followed by 1.3 > > As to the project name my preference would be > Jakarta Http Components (and if this also turns out to be a no-no) > Jakarta Haiku > Jakarta HttpAgent > > I think Roland generated some really great ideas. We might still want to > run a poll on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] before we formally vote on the project > name. > > > (2) Migration to JIRA. This finally can happen and happen very soon. The > > question is if we still want it. If yes, might have to decide on the > > project name before the migration takes place > > > > Jira does provide more capabilities, which can prove very useful. > However, Bugzilla works just fine too and appears well supported these > days. I probably close the request for now until we know how to proceed > further. > > > (3) 3.0 release. 3.0rc3 have not had any major bugs reported for quite some > > time. Do we want to release another RC4 before the final release or not? > > > > Just sit and wait for another month. If some serious bugs are reported > go RC4. Otherwise go final > > Oleg > > > Please let me know what you think. Everyone is very welcome to throw in > > their ideas > > > > Cheers, > > > > Oleg > > PS: Henri, I took liberty of putting you on the CC to keep you in the loop. > > I hope it is okay with you > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
