DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37988>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37988 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-22 13:56 ------- Created an attachment (id=17942) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17942&action=view) patch to add authority to httphost > No, it should not. HttpClient is not supposed to implement FTP specific concerns. > > Feel free to extend the standard GetMethod class and override the default > behaviour of the #writeRequestLine() method the way we deem appropriate for your > specific application. > > Oleg Thanks for you reaction, but I tend to disagree. This is not ftp specific, but host specific (i.e. the host to connect to). Besides, by registering another protocol with Protocol.registerProtocol(...) it is already possible to use non-http-like protocols. The authority is a part of a host (in this case a httphost using the ftp protocol), just the same as it is a part of the URL. This patch adds the authority to the HttpHost. I think that the following HTTP requestline is valid: GET http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/file.html HTTP/1.1 Therefore I think the following should be valid too: GET ftp://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/file.html HTTP/1.1 I hope you can see my point. If not, at least I have a patch locally. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
