DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37988>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37988 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-22 15:30 ------- (In reply to comment #21) Besides, by registering another > protocol with Protocol.registerProtocol(...) it is already possible to use > non-http-like protocols. > Ability to register a protocol socket factory does not in any way imply support for that protocol. > The authority is a part of a host (in this case a httphost using the ftp > protocol), just the same as it is a part of the URL. This patch adds the > authority to the HttpHost. > > I think that the following HTTP requestline is valid: > GET http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/file.html HTTP/1.1 > I do not think this is the case. RFC2617 clearly defines the way to transmit user credentials with HTTP messages. Oleg -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
