> Could you please find out if this difference is consistent regardless of > the CPU core number used by the system?
Done, see other email I didn't record all figures, but did run multiple times and records differences. > Honestly, there is really no significant differences between the two I > can think of. I cannot completely rule out a possibility of some green > men from Mars randomly inserting Thread#sleep() statements but I > consider it unlikely. I'll see if I can reproduce the issue locally. I couldn't imagine a difference but in testing on 32-core with BlockingChannelConnector I got: - 3.1 | 75 K TPS - 4.3.3 Minimal / 4.2.6 | 74 K TPS - 4.3.3 DefultHttpClient | 72 K TPS - 4.3.3 Builder (from your test) | 68 K TPS The difference is small, but it's an interesting problem, working out whats going on. 74 vs 75 is irrelevant, but 68 vs. 75 is bigger. >> I'm still not seeing a major issue with the contention i mentioned i'd >> seen in profiler, be an interesting experiment to test performance >> with 500 treads, both with/without proxies though. >> > > I'll give it a shot this weekend. Not sure you'll see any difference is cpu is constrained. If you do do it, I can test on 32-core box for you. Dan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: httpclient-users-h...@hc.apache.org
