>> That's also based on the >> assumption that some application project might eventually join us >> "at some distant point in the future". In that case, HC wouldn't >> be an appropriate description for all our activities anymore.
> Why? No non-HTTP app should join us anyway so... if they want to have > a name then fine, e.g. Apache HttpComponents Droids - fits in > perfectly IMHO. There's two words in "HttpComponents". Applications are not components, at least in my book :-) > (Compare that to Apache Lucene and its sub-projects, I think that's > more impractical.) I'll have a look, thanks for the pointer. cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
